[esa-t474] spectrometer uncertainty
Bino Maiheu
bino at hep.ucl.ac.uk
Thu Dec 6 09:15:22 GMT 2007
Hi Eric,
> This stuff is important, and I am glad somebody is
> trying to think about it deeply. You should state right
> up front in your note that you are defining E_beam as
> the beam energy in the middle of the chicane. I don't
> know how much energy loss there is in the ESA chicane
> (something you should calculate) but I would guess the
> beam energy loss through each dipole pair is significant
> at the 100 ppm level.
Indeed. I'm looking to some formulas to calculate the energy loss at the
moment, so I'll be producing some plots for reference.
> Also, don't forget about the installed precision on
> the roll of the magnets. This directly affects int(B dl)
> and probably will be one of your largest uncertainties.
> It is possible that you can actually measure this better
> than the survey accuracy from the BPM data by looking for
> a "bend" in the vertical direction, although you will be
> fighting against a sin(theta) term. Perhaps this is
> already being done.
Right, I don't think anyone is looking into this, but I'll definitely
put it on the list. Can do it quite easily with the simulation program.
Thanks for your comments !
Cheers,
bino
> Regards,
> -Eric
>
> On Dec 5, 2007, at 8:10 AM, Bino Maiheu wrote:
>
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I've started some studies concerning the uncertainty and the overall
> > layout of the chicane. I wanted to make some plots first of all in the
> > style of Karl-Heinz Hiller ( see LC-DET-2004-031 ), but for a 4 magnet
> > chicane. I think it's important that we have a think about how to
> > calculate the energy in a 4 magnet chicane and that we fix the
> > formalism
> > for later studies. So I've started a small writeup, which you can
> > see in
> > attachment.
> >
> > I also included a plots which shows the \Delta E/E versus \Delta B/B,
> > distance between the first 2 magnets, distance between the central BPM
> > and the second magnet ( as these are the 2 independent
> > variables ! ) and
> > the uncertainty on these quantities, for BPM resolutions of 1um, 500,
> > 100 and 50 nm. There is more explanation in what I have written so
> > far,
> > which are nothing more than some initial thoughts, but I wanted to
> > distribute this already now for early feedback.
> >
> > My plan next is to extrapolate these plots for ILC chicane and
> > subsequently use a full Geant 4 simulation with real fieldmaps to
> > reproduce and study these curves more in detail as a function of
> > magnetic field uniformity and misalignments of BPMs and Magnets.
> >
> > Questions and sort of drafting of a TODO list are welcome.
> >
> > Bino
> >
> >
> > --
> > !!!!!
> > ( o o )
> > @ -- Bino Maiheu, Dr. ;) ---------oOO----(_)----OOo------- @
> > / :: WORK .:: / :: HOME .:: /
> > / University College London / /
> > / Physics and Astronomy / 31 Kilgour Road /
> > / Gower Street / Forest Hill /
> > / London WC1E 6BT / London SE23 1PG /
> > / [tel] +44 20 7679 3454 / United Kingdom /
> > / [fax] +44 20 7679 7145 / [mob] +44 7747 75 58 78 /
> > @ --------------------------------------------------------
> > @<spectrometerNote.pdf>_______________________________________________
> > esa-t474 mailing list
> > esa-t474 at hep.ucl.ac.uk
> > https://mail.hep.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/esa-t474
>
--
!!!!!
( o o )
@ -- Bino Maiheu, Dr. ;) ---------oOO----(_)----OOo------- @
/ :: WORK .:: / :: HOME .:: /
/ University College London / /
/ Physics and Astronomy / 31 Kilgour Road /
/ Gower Street / Forest Hill /
/ London WC1E 6BT / London SE23 1PG /
/ [tel] +44 20 7679 3454 / United Kingdom /
/ [fax] +44 20 7679 7145 / [mob] +44 7747 75 58 78 /
@ -------------------------------------------------------- @
More information about the esa-t474
mailing list